Genre=Documentary; Vickie Curtis; ; Directed by=Jeff Orlowski; 2020; runtime=1 h, 34M

☼♢ ⌘♲⌘♲⌘♲

☼♢

☼♢ Putlockers Links

☼♢ ⊛✺⊛✺⊛✺

The social dilemma trailer. The social dilemma rotten tomatoes. The social dilemma trailer 2020 movie.

The social dilemma film. The social dilemma full documentary. The social dilemma netflix. The social dilemma book. The social dilemma democracy. The social dilemma download. The social dilemma tristan harris. The social dilemma online. The social dilemma plot. The Social dilemme w9. The social dilemma documentary youtube. This film explores the cultural changes in society created by social media, as told by experts in the field and often the actual creators of the platforms themselves.
Both eye opening and unsettling, the film details the growing monetization of the human attention span. Remarkably unfiltered, the film is an absolute must watch for anyone who finds themselves at a loss with the direction the world is going.
There are some dramatizations in the film which should have been left on the cutting room floor, as they detract from the essence of the interviews. But other than that, a great film.

The social dilemma questions. The social dilemma netflix producer. The social dilemma wiki. The social dilemma rotten tomato. The Social dilemmas. The social dilemma rotten. The social dilemma script. The social dilemma movie summary. The social dilemma on netflix. The social dilemma by tristan harris. The social dilemma buy. The social dilemma documentary summary.

The social dilemma quotes. The social dilemma 2020 movie. The social dilemma trailer 2020. The Social dilemmes. The social dilemma summary. The social dilemma reviews. The social dilemma documentary netflix. The social dilemma release date. The social dilemma online free. The Social Dilemma does a good job outlining the ills and evils of social media, the attention economy, and surveillance capitalism. I would recommend it for anyone unfamiliar with this underbelly of the modern internet (although maybe skip the acted parts, they don't add much. If this is the first time you've encountered these concepts, sure! start here. But don't stop here. (The movie Feels Good Man is a good next step.)
However! As someone who's been paying attention to these trends for awhile now, I was disappointed anytime the movie tried to go any deeper than its central thesis. It's functional, but overly simplistic for the sake of accessible sensationalism, and dangerously shallow whenever it comes close to anything political.
There's actually one specific moment that almost completely embodies these faults: as someone talks about how social media has lead to polarization on "both sides" they show a clip of the Charlottesville rally vehicle attack, where a far-right terrorist drove his car through a crowd of people, killing one woman. The political and historical context for what was being shown was completely missing. And this is something the movie does a lot. It shows contextless footage of people smashing windows, of fights breaking out in the street, of the Chirstchurch shooting, for god sake. The film is so myopic in its "social media bad" message that it doesn't do any of this real justice. It does not understand or accurately present online radicalization or the political violence it can incite. And this would be fine if it didn't try, but it does. The main arc of the live action sections is of a teenaged white boy's decent into radical online content, as he grows distant from his family and becomes further enmeshed in an extremist ideology. The ideology shown is vague, with essentially the only concrete belief shown being climate-change denial. He's shown watching videos with people making veiled calls for violent action, doing whatever it takes. And then, at the end, they turn the social media machine off, and. he's better? That's it. br> Yeah. That's it.
I think the most insightful point in the film is that these technologies don't on their own have the capacity for harm, they can only magnify the flaws that already exist in society. But the film seems dead set on critiquing the tech but not society. The acts of violence they show all have specific motives, specific ideologies behind them, but those go completely unmentioned. And if you just turn the social media machine off, well, that teen is still gonna believe whatever extremism he found a home in, he's still gonna be connected to communities trying to radicalize him further. Changing how Facebook works isn't gonna stop there from being neo-nazis. These problems are incredibly complicated. And this movie? It just isn't complicated.
The folks they interview mostly come from the world of tech and still believe in its central principles, even if they've grown to be critical of how things have been implemented and the impacts these technologies have had. They advocate for holding companies like Facebook and Google accountable, and forcing them to change their practices. But these companies don't exist in a vacuum, and they've grown to their current size and power exactly because of these harmful practices. Just as the systems these companies have created rewards content which monopolizes people's attention by pushing them further down rabbit holes of radicalization, the system they exist within rewards the companies for their blatant disregard for common welfare. The profit motives for radicalizing that kid don't just go away.
It's an alright film. It's a fine introduction. It's just so shallow. And after watching it all, with all these frustrations, to hear them talk over the credits about their optimism, about how the system can be reformed, only to have it end, and for netflix to autoplay a trailer, specifically suited to my tastes. it doesn't exactly give me a lot of confidence.